Europe Just Regulated ChatGPT Like It's Google — And NYC Schools Are Banning AI Through 8th Grade

-

Two things happened this week that nobody was fully prepared for: the EU just legally classified ChatGPT as a search engine, and New York City banned AI for students through eighth grade. Different problems, same underlying panic — nobody knows how to govern this technology.

Europe Just Regulated ChatGPT Like It's Google

On September 1, 2026, the European Commission designated ChatGPT as a Very Large Online Search Engine (VLOSE) under the EU's Digital Services Act. This is the same legal category as Google Search and Bing.

The threshold for VLOSE status is 45 million average monthly users in the EU. ChatGPT has 159 million. It blew past the threshold by 3.5x. The designation means OpenAI now faces a completely different tier of EU regulation — more transparency requirements, more audits, and significantly higher compliance obligations.

This is genuinely unprecedented. ChatGPT isn't a search engine in the traditional sense, but when 159 million Europeans are using it to find information instead of Googling, regulators are arguing it functions like one. And functionally? They're not wrong.

What Does the VLOSE Label Actually Mean for You?

If you're using ChatGPT in the EU, you probably won't notice much immediately. The impact is mostly on OpenAI as a company — they'll need to produce transparency reports, submit to third-party audits, give researchers access to data, and potentially modify how they surface information to comply with DSA rules designed to prevent algorithmic amplification of harmful content.

But longer term, this could shape how ChatGPT works in Europe. OpenAI may need to build EU-specific features — or restrictions — that don't apply elsewhere. We've seen this movie with Google and Facebook already.

NYC Just Banned Student AI Through 8th Grade

Meanwhile across the Atlantic, New York City took a hammer to the problem. The city has barred students from using AI through eighth grade — meaning kids up to around age 13 or 14 are now officially prohibited from using AI tools for schoolwork in NYC public schools.

This is a significant reversal from NYC's earlier, more permissive stance. The city had previously lifted a blanket ChatGPT ban and was experimenting with AI in classrooms. Now it's pulling back hard on younger students.

The concern is well-documented: younger students who use AI before developing foundational skills in reading, writing, and critical thinking may never fully develop those skills. But the ban is also going to be nearly impossible to enforce — kids go home, kids have phones, kids find workarounds.

Texas Is Also Freezing Data Centers

One more domino fell this week: Texas froze new data center power hookups after a surge of "ghost" demand — companies claiming power they didn't actually need, apparently to lock in capacity for future AI infrastructure buildouts. The Texas grid authority had to pump the brakes before the real demand projections caused reliability problems.

This is becoming a national issue. The power demand from AI infrastructure is straining grids across the US, and states are scrambling to figure out how to balance economic development with grid stability.

My Take

All three of these stories point to the same thing: AI adoption outran the governance layer by years, and now regulators everywhere are playing catch-up. The EU is using existing laws designed for search engines because they don't have better tools yet. NYC is banning things it can't effectively enforce. Texas is freezing infrastructure because the growth was happening faster than anyone planned for.

None of this is going to slow AI down meaningfully. But it is going to shape the messy, imperfect rules that govern how we use it for the next decade.

What's your experience? Drop a comment below! 👇 Should schools ban AI for younger students, or should they be teaching kids how to use it responsibly instead? And do you think the EU's approach to regulating ChatGPT as a search engine actually makes sense?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Plank You App Support and Privacy

-
Plank You is a simple, ad-free interval timer for planks and core workouts. Set your work and rest times, hold your plank, and let the countdown beeps do the counting. Everything runs on your device. no ads, no accounts, no tracking. How to use Start / Pause / Resume: tap the main button to run or pause the timer. Reset returns to Rep 1 and the start of your work interval. Rep counter — counts up automatically after each full work + rest cycle. Beeps — the last 5 seconds of every phase beep down (5-4-3-2-1), with a longer tone when the phase changes. Changing intervals Tap the settings icon (top right) to choose an interval: 45 / 15 default (45s work, 15s rest) 30 / 30 50 / 10 Custom — set any work and rest time in 5-second steps You can also toggle Beep sounds and Haptics in Settings. FAQ I don't hear any sound. Sound plays even when your ringer is on silent, but make sure the media volume is up and that "Beep sounds" is turned on in Settings. If another app is ...
Read more

WWDC 2026 Preview: Apple Needs to Fix Siri or It's Game Over for Apple Intelligence

-
Apple's WWDC 2026 kicks off on June 8, and the stakes couldn't be higher. While Google announced 900 million Gemini users at I/O last week, Apple is heading into its biggest developer conference with one uncomfortable question hanging over the whole event: what happened to Siri? I've been using Apple devices daily since the original iPhone, and I'll say it plainly — Apple Intelligence has been the most underwhelming software launch in Apple's recent history. WWDC 2026 is Apple's chance to fix that. Here's what they need to announce, what we're expecting, and what a failure would mean. The Problem Apple Needs to Solve When Apple announced Apple Intelligence at WWDC 2024, the demos were impressive. When the features started rolling out through 2025, the reality was a different story. The "new Siri" was slower, less reliable, and often less capable than the old one for basic tasks. The "Personal Context" features that were supposed ...
Read more

This AI Startup Is Worth $26 Billion and Writes 90% of Its Own Code — Should Software Engineers Be Worried?

-
I've been watching the AI coding space very closely for the past year, and every few months something happens that forces me to recalibrate my sense of how fast things are moving. This week, that moment came from Cognition AI — the startup behind Devin, the AI software engineer — which just announced a $1 billion funding round at a $26 billion valuation . But the number that actually stopped me cold wasn't the valuation. It was this: 90% of Cognition's own code is now written by Devin. From $10B to $26B in Eight Months — The Numbers Are Staggering Let's put this in perspective. Just eight months ago, in September 2025, Cognition closed a $400 million round at a $10.2 billion valuation. Today, that valuation has more than doubled to $26 billion. The new round was co-led by Lux Capital, General Catalyst, and 8VC, with Ribbit Capital, Atreides Management, and Peter Thiel's Founders Fund also participating. But what's really driving this isn't hype — it...
Read more